Neff

Neasham & Kramer LLP v. Neff

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 7, 20222:19-cv-00565California866 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NEASHAM & KRAMER, LLP, a No. 2:19-cv-00565-MCE-KJN California Limited Liability Partnership, 12 Plaintiff, ORDER v. 14 STEPHEN NEFF, an individual, 15 Defendant. 16 17 On November 8, 2021, Defendant Stephen Neff (“Defendant”) filed redacted versions of the following documents: (1) Defendant’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (“Motion”), (2) Defendant’s Declaration in Support of Defendant’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (“Declaration”), and (3) Defendant’s Statement of Undisputed Facts Concerning Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (“Statement of Undisputed Facts”). ECF Nos. 40–42. Subsequently, on December 2, 2021, Defendant filed a Notice of Errata, attaching 104 pages of redacted exhibits in support of its Motion. ECF No. 48. Presently before the Court is Defendant’s third Notice of 26 1 According to Defendant, “[o]nly information specifically relating to ‘Company X,’ the lawsuit 27 between [Defendant] and ‘Company X,’ and the confidential settlement…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.