Doe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JANE DOE, Case No. 1:21-cv-01103-NONE-SAB

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT

TIMOTHY BEACH’S SUBSTITUTION OF

v. ATTORNEY WITHOUT PREJUDICE

DERRAL ADAMS, et al., (ECF No. 25) Defendants.

16 On January 7, 2022, Defendant Timothy Beach filed a notice of substitution of attorney substituting himself as a pro se party for attorney Susan E. Coleman of Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP, located at 444 South Flower Street, Suite 2400, Los Angeles, CA 90017. (ECF No. 25.) The Court notes, however, that Mr. Beach is not a licensed attorney in the State of California and pursuant to Local Rule 182(d), his attorney may not withdraw as counsel and leave Mr. Beach in pro per without leave of Court upon noticed motion. E.D. Cal. L.R. 182(d). More specifically, Local Rule 182(d) provides:

Unless otherwise provided herein, an attorney who has appeared may not withdraw leaving the client in propria persona without leave of court upon…