Munoz

Munoz v. PHH Mortgage Corp.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 7, 20221:08-cv-00759California1,525 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EFRAIN MUNOZ, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, et al., No. 1:08-cv-00759-MMB-BAM 6 Plaintiffs, ORDER RESPECTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION v. IN LIMINE #3 10 PHH MORTGAGE CORPORATION, et al., 13 Defendants. Defendants’ third motion in limine (ECF 471) seeks “to preclude any ar- gument, evidence, or testimony regarding separate government enforcement proceedings involving unproven allegations of Real Estate Settlement Proce- dures Act non-compliance.” ECF 471, at 1 (“defined term” omitted). Defendants express concern that Plaintiffs wish to admit evidence regarding (1) eight sep- arate actions, brought by either the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau or the Minnesota Department of Commerce against certain non-party mortgage insurance companies, that were settled without any finding of or admission of liability; and (2) an action the CFPB brought against…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.