Munoz
Munoz v. PHH Mortgage Corp.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EFRAIN MUNOZ, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, et al., No. 1:08-cv-00759-MMB-BAM 6 Plaintiffs, ORDER RESPECTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION v. IN LIMINE #3 10 PHH MORTGAGE CORPORATION, et al., 13 Defendants. Defendants’ third motion in limine (ECF 471) seeks “to preclude any ar- gument, evidence, or testimony regarding separate government enforcement proceedings involving unproven allegations of Real Estate Settlement Proce- dures Act non-compliance.” ECF 471, at 1 (“defined term” omitted). Defendants express concern that Plaintiffs wish to admit evidence regarding (1) eight sep- arate actions, brought by either the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau or the Minnesota Department of Commerce against certain non-party mortgage insurance companies, that were settled without any finding of or admission of liability; and (2) an action the CFPB brought against…