Massey
(PC) McCoy v. Massey
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JASON MCCOY, No. 2:18-cv-2180 WBS AC P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SKY MASSEY, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, seeks relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The case is referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. The Third Amended Complaint, ECF No. 23, is now before the court for screening. Two previous versions of the complaint were screened and found not to state a claim for relief; plaintiff has twice been granted leave to amend. ECF Nos. 14, 17. For the reasons explained below, the undersigned recommends that this case proceed on Claim One of the Third Amended Complaint against defendants Massey and Canello only, and that all other claims and defendants be dismissed. I. SCREENING REQUIREMENT The court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental…