Walters

(PC) Thomas v. Walters

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 10, 20222:18-cv-01711California4,010 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CLIFFORD BRENT THOMAS, No. 2:18-CV-1711-KJM-DMC-P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS J. WALTERS, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court are Defendants Barba, De Jesus, Holmes, Szmanski, Miranda, English, Halloran, Tran, Rushing, Escobar, Tong, Walters, and Miller’s motion for partial summary judgment, ECF No. 45, Plaintiff’s opposition, ECF No. 48, and Defendants’ reply, ECF No. 49. 22 I. BACKGROUND This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s first amended complaint. See ECF No. 13. Plaintiff named the following as defendants: (1) Sgt. J. Walters; (2) R. Santisteban, a correction officer; (3) C. Szmanski, a correction officer; (4) D. English, a correction officer; (5) F. Holmes, a correction officer; (6) N. Rushing, a correction officer; (7) L. Saeteurn, a correction…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.