Ketzler
Ketzler v. Faucher
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
JOHANNES KETZLER and NIKO GROTH, ) Case No.: 1:20-cv-0430 BAK (SKO) ) Plaintiffs, ) ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK TO CLOSE ) THE ACTION v. )
ROBERT ROYAL FAUCHER, ) (Doc. 30) ) Defendant. ) )
On December 28, 2021, the parties filed a stipulation indicating all parties agreed that the above- captioned action is dismissed in its entirety, with prejudice. (Doc. 30.) Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), “the plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing . . . a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared.” Because all parties who have appeared signed the stipulation, it “automatically terminate[d] the action.” Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997); see also Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Accordingly, based upon the stipulation of the parties, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this action. 24 IT IS SO ORDERED.