Ketzler

Ketzler v. Faucher

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 10, 20221:20-cv-00430California197 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOHANNES KETZLER and NIKO GROTH, ) Case No.: 1:20-cv-0430 BAK (SKO) ) Plaintiffs, ) ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK TO CLOSE ) THE ACTION v. )

ROBERT ROYAL FAUCHER, ) (Doc. 30) ) Defendant. ) )

On December 28, 2021, the parties filed a stipulation indicating all parties agreed that the above- captioned action is dismissed in its entirety, with prejudice. (Doc. 30.) Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), “the plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing . . . a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared.” Because all parties who have appeared signed the stipulation, it “automatically terminate[d] the action.” Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997); see also Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Accordingly, based upon the stipulation of the parties, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this action. 24 IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 7, 2022 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.