Dorothy

(PS) Van Den Heuvel v. Dorothy

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 10, 20222:21-cv-02176California3,843 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JEAN MARC VAN DEN HEUVEL, No. 2:21–cv–2176–TLN–CKD PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER GRANTING IFP REQUEST &

GRANTING LEAVE TO AMEND

DOROTHY, et al., (ECF Nos. 1-2) Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, who is proceeding without counsel in this action, seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). (ECF No. 2.) See 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (authorizing the commencement of an action “without prepayment of fees or security” by a person who is unable to pay such fees). Plaintiff’s affidavit makes the required financial showing, so plaintiff’s request is granted. However, the determination that a plaintiff may proceed without payment of fees does not complete the inquiry. Under the IFP statute, federal courts must screen IFP complaints and dismiss any case that is “frivolous or malicious,” “fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted,” or seeks monetary relief against an immune defendant. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B); Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.