Jenkins

Jenkins v. City of Vallejo

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 11, 20222:19-cv-01896California1,997 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DEYANA JENKINS,

Plaintiff, No. 2:19-cv-01896-TLN-DB

13 v. ORDER CITY OF VALLEJO and ANDREW

BIDOU,

16 Defendants,

18 19 20 21 This matter is before the Court on two motions: (1) Defendants City of Vallejo and Andrew Bidou (“Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss, Motion to Strike (ECF No. 11); and (2) Plaintiff Deyana Jenkins’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion for Leave to Amend. (ECF No. 25.) Both parties filed oppositions and replies. (ECF Nos. 13, 15, 27, 28.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court hereby GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion and DENIES Defendants’ motion as moot. /// 28 I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND This case arises out of Plaintiff’s arrest by Vallejo police officers on April 15, 2019, during which she alleges the officers used excessive force in violation of the United States Constitution and California law. (See ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff filed this action on September 18, 2019, alleging violations of the Fourth Amendment,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.