(SS) Dale v. Commissioner of Social Security

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

5 6 KRISTEN ALICIA DALE, CASE NO.: 1:20-cv-00344-BKA-GSA 7 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT v. EXTENSION TO FILE RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR KILOLO KIJAKAZI, acting SUMMARY JUDGMENT Commissioner of Social Security,

11 Defendant.

13 The parties stipulate to a 36-day extension of time from January 10, 2021 to February 15, 2022 for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment due to counsel’s workload. This is Defendant’s second extension. The Scheduling Order allows for a single extension of thirty days by the stipulation of the parties. Doc. 5 at 3. Beyond the single extension by stipulation, “requests to modify [the scheduling] order must be made by written motion and will be granted only for good cause.” Id. When considering whether good cause exists to modify a scheduling order, courts consider the foreseeability of the impediment to meeting the deadline and the party’s diligence in…