(HC) Jacome v. "IRS" of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 12, 20221:21-cv-01816California1,588 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ALEXANDER JACOME, Case No. 1:21-cv-01816-AWI-SKO

Petitioner, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO

DISMISS AMENDED PETITION FOR

v. WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION,

et al., Respondents.

17 On December 3, 2021, Petitioner filed a petition for writ of mandamus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1361. (Doc. 1.) On January 5, 2022, the Court issued a Findings and Recommendation to dismiss the petition. (Doc. 9.) On January 5, 2022, Petitioner also filed the instant first amended petition for writ of habeas corpus. (Doc. 10.) The petition for writ of writ of habeas corpus fails to state a cognizable claim. Therefore, the Court will recommend the first amended petition be DISMISSED. DISCUSSION I. Preliminary Review of Petition Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases requires the Court to make a preliminary review of each petition for writ of habeas corpus. The Court must summarily…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.