(HC) Jacome v. "IRS" of California
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 12, 20221:21-cv-01816California1,588 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
ALEXANDER JACOME, Case No. 1:21-cv-01816-AWI-SKO
Petitioner, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO
DISMISS AMENDED PETITION FOR
v. WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION,
et al., Respondents.
17 On December 3, 2021, Petitioner filed a petition for writ of mandamus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1361. (Doc. 1.) On January 5, 2022, the Court issued a Findings and Recommendation to dismiss the petition. (Doc. 9.) On January 5, 2022, Petitioner also filed the instant first amended petition for writ of habeas corpus. (Doc. 10.) The petition for writ of writ of habeas corpus fails to state a cognizable claim. Therefore, the Court will recommend the first amended petition be DISMISSED. DISCUSSION I. Preliminary Review of Petition Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases requires the Court to make a preliminary review of each petition for writ of habeas corpus. The Court must summarily…