(PC) Quarles v. California State Prison Corcoran

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 12, 20221:19-cv-00109California1,148 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 NIKKO JAVOR QUARLES, Case No. 1:19-cv-00109-AWI-HBK Plaintiff, v. ORDER SETTING SETTLEMENT

CONFERENCE

J. VELASQUEZ, et al., Defendants. 17 Plaintiff Nikko Javor Quarles is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action brought under 42 U.S.C. §1983. The Court refers all civil rights cases filed by pro se individuals to Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) to attempt to resolve such cases more expeditiously and less expensively. See also Local Rule 270. In appropriate cases, defense counsel from the California Attorney General’s Office have agreed to participate in ADR. No claims, defenses, or objections are waived by the parties’ participation. Attempting to resolve this matter through settlement now would save the parties the time and expense of engaging in discovery and preparing substantive dispositive motions. The Court therefore will STAY this action for 90 days to allow the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.