Baughman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DANIEL LEE THORNBERRY, Case No. 2:19-cv-00639-MCE-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

TO MODIFY THE SCHEDULING ORDER

v. ECF No. 42 DAVID BAUGHMAN, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff has filed a motion asking the court either to order that defendants provide copies of documents or, in the alternative, to reopen discovery for sixty days. ECF No. 42. Plaintiff’s motion will be denied. On September 1, 2021, the court issued a scheduling order requiring that all discovery, including the filing of any motions to compel discovery, be completed by February 26, 2021. Prior to that, plaintiff had filed two motions to compel defendants to provide further responses to certain interrogatories and requests for production. ECF Nos. 33 & 37. Before the court resolved those motions, defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. ECF No. 39. Plaintiff’s motions to compel were still pending, and he promptly moved for a ninety-day…