Manzo

Manzo v. McDonald's Restaurants of California, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 12, 20221:20-cv-01175California2,398 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GENNIFER MANZO, Case No. 1:20-cv-1175-HBK Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PRELIMINARY

APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION AND

v. PAGA SETTLEMENT WITHOUT

PREJUDICE

MCDONALD’S RESTAURANTS OF CALIFORNIA, INC., AND DOES 1-50, (Doc. No. 15) 15 Defendants.

17 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff Gennifer Manzo’s (“Plaintiff” or “Manzo”) unopposed Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action and Private Attorneys General Act Settlement, filed on October 22, 2021. (Doc. No. 15). For the reasons stated herein, the Court denies the motion without prejudice. BACKGROUND Plaintiff filed the present action on September 20, 2020. (Doc. No. 1). Asserting diversity jurisdiction under the Class Action Fairness Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d), she brought claims for penalties under California Labor Code §§ 226 and 2698, et seq., the Private Attorney Generals Act (“PAGA”). (Id. at 1-2). Plaintiff is a former…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.