Betancourt

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 CESAR A. BETANCOURT, Case No. 1:22-cv-00033-JLT-EPG Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

RECOMMENDING THAT PLAINTIFF’S

v. APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA

PAUPERIS BE DENIED WITHOUT

TOTAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, PREJUDICE Defendant. (ECF No. 2) OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

TWENTY-ONE DAYS

17 Plaintiff Cesar A. Betancourt, proceeding pro se, filed this lawsuit on January 7, 2022, generally alleging that Defendant Total Property Management has violated the “CARES Act” by “push[ing]” his wife to move out of the house in the middle of the pandemic and while she was recovering from a stroke.1 (ECF No. 1). Plaintiff has also filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF No. 2). Because review of the application indicates that Plaintiff can afford to pay the filing fee in this case, the Court recommends that the application be denied. The “denial of leave to…