Toor

(PC) McNeil v. Toor

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 12, 20221:19-cv-01257California856 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL MCNEIL, Case No. 1:19−cv−01257−DAD−HBK Plaintiff, ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFF’S

OPPOSITION FILINGS, DIRECTING

v. RESUBMISSION OF OPPOSITION, AND

DEEMING DEFENDANTS’ EX PARTE

KIRAN TOOR, PAL VIRK, TIN-AUNG REQUEST FOR EXTENSION TO FILE SHWE, and HARMINDER LONGIA, REPLY MOOT 15 Defendants. (Doc. Nos. 57, 58, 59, 60, 61) 16 Pending before the Court is the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants Kiran Toor, Pal Virk, Tin-Aung Shwe, and Harminder Longia (“Defendants”) on November 10, 2021. (Doc. No. 53, “MSJ”). On January 5, 2022, purportedly in opposition to the MSJ, the Court received several filings from Plaintiff Michael McNeil (“Plaintiff” or “McNeil”). (Doc. Nos. 58- 60). On January 11, 2022, Defendants sought an extension of time to file a reply due to Plaintiff’s voluminous filings. (Doc. No. 61). ORGANIZATION OF PLAINTIFF’S FILINGS Plaintiff’s combined filings exceed over 1000…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.