Hogan

Williams v. Hogan

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 12, 20221:22-cv-00044California706 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CLIFTON WILLIAMS, JR., Case No. 1:22-cv-00044-JLT-SAB 11 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS v. ORDER DIRECTING PAYMENT

P. HOGAN, et al., OF INMATE FILING FEE BY

STANISLAUS COUNTY SHERIFF’S Defendants. DEPARTMENT AND DIRECTING CLERK OF THE COURT TO ISSUE PRISONER

NEW CASE DOCUMENTS

16 (ECF No. 2) 17 Plaintiff Clifton Williams Jr. is a pre-trial detainee proceeding pro se pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §1983 and has requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (ECF No. 2.) Plaintiff has made the showing required by § 1915(a) and accordingly, the request to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted. Plaintiff is obligated to pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00 for this action. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). Plaintiff is obligated to make monthly payments in the amount of twenty percent of the preceding…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.