(SS) Eidson v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 12, 20221:22-cv-00049California823 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BARRY LYNN EIDSON, Case No. 1:22-cv-00049-SAB

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING DENYING

v. PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO PAY THE

FILING FEE AND DIRECTING CLERK OF

Defendant. THE COURT TO RANDOMLY ASSIGN A

DISTRICT JUDGE

16 (ECF No. 2)

OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN

DAYS

19 Plaintiff Barry Lynn Eidson filed a complaint on January 11, 2022, challenging a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying his application for disability benefits. Plaintiff did not pay the filing fee in this action and instead filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (ECF No. 2.) In order to proceed in court without prepayment of the filing fee, a plaintiff must submit an affidavit demonstrating that he “is unable to pay such fees or give security therefor.” 28 U.S.C. §…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.