Sherman

(PC) Martinez v. Sherman

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 13, 20221:21-cv-01319California4,696 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RODOLFO MARTINEZ, Case No. 1:21-cv-01319-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

RANDOMLY ASSIGN DISTRICT JUDGE TO

v. ACTION

S. SHERMAN, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

REGARDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION

Defendants. (ECF No. 10)

FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE

18 Plaintiff Rodolfo Martinez (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 19 pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff’s complaint, filed on 20 September 1, 2021, was screened and Plaintiff was granted leave to amend. Plaintiff’s first 21 amended complaint, filed on October 18, 2021 is before the Court for screening. (Doc. 10.)

I. Screening Requirement and Standard

23 The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a 24 governmental entity and/or against an officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. 25 § 1915A(a). Plaintiff’s complaint, or any portion…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.