Unknown

(PC) Pavao v. Unknown

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 13, 20222:21-cv-02082California3,774 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ENRICO PAVAO, No. 2:21-cv-2082 TLN AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER UNKNOWN, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff, a county jail inmate proceeding pro se, seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and has requested authority pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF Nos. 1, 2, 6. Plaintiff has also filed a motion for the appointment of counsel. ECF No. 3. This proceeding was referred to this Court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). For the reasons stated below, Plaintiff will be ordered to file an amended complaint or face dismissal. In addition, Plaintiff’s request for the appointment of counsel will be denied. I. IN FORMA PAUPERIS APPLICATION Plaintiff has submitted a declaration that makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). ECF Nos. 2, 6. Accordingly, the request to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted. Plaintiff is required to pay the statutory…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.