Newsom

(PC) Williams v. Newsom

Bad Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 13, 20222:19-cv-02229California1,954 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 BENNY WILLIAMS, Case No. 2:19-cv-02229-KJM-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

THAT DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR

v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT BE GRANTED

AND PLAINTIFF’S CLAIMS BE DISMISSED

GAVIN NEWSOM, et al., FOR FAILURE TO EXHAUST

ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES

Defendants.

OBJECTIONS DUE IN 14 DAYS

13 ECF No. 51

15 Benny Williams (“plaintiff”) alleges that Gavin Newsom, Jennifer Shaffer, and G. Bakerjian (“defendants”) violated his due process and equal protection rights by failing to follow proper procedures concerning elderly parole. Defendants have filed a motion for summary judgment that argues, among other things, that plaintiff failed to exhaust his claims against them before filing this action. ECF No. 51. I have reviewed the pleadings and agree. Motion for Summary Judgment A. Legal Standards 1. Summary Judgment Standard Summary judgment is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.