Azevedo
(PC) Muhammad v. Azevedo
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANSAR EL MUHAMMAD, No. 2:21-cv-0894 KJM DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER D. AZEVEDO, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff alleges defendants violated his due process rights when they failed to provide him with timely notary services. On screening, this court found plaintiff failed to state any claims cognizable under section 1983. (See Aug. 5, 2021 Order (ECF No. 8).) Plaintiff was given 60 days to file a first amended complaint. When plaintiff did not file a timely amended complaint or otherwise respond to the August 5 order, this court recommended this case be dismissed for plaintiff’s failure to prosecute and failure to comply with court orders. (See Nov. 2, 2021 Findings and Recommendations (ECF No. 11).) In a document filed December 1, 2021, plaintiff states that he is objecting to the findings 26 …