Saenz
Saenz v. Aramark Campus, LLC
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9 10 JARED SAENZ, Case No. 1:20-cv-01462-DAD-SAB Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT
TO CLOSE CASE AND ADJUST THE
v. DOCKET TO REFLECT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE 41 (a) ARAMARK CAMPUS, LLC, OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL
PROCEDURE
Defendant. (ECF No. 12) 15 On January 13, 2022, a stipulation was filed dismissing this action with prejudice and 17 with each party to bear its own costs and fees. In light of the stipulation of the parties, this action 18 has been terminated, Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)Gi); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 19 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed with prejudice and without an award of costs or attorneys’ fees. Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY ORDERED to CLOSE the file in this 22 case and adjust the docket to reflect voluntary dismissal of this action pursuant to Rule (a).