Saenz

Saenz v. Aramark Campus, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 13, 20221:20-cv-01462California200 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9 10 JARED SAENZ, Case No. 1:20-cv-01462-DAD-SAB Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO CLOSE CASE AND ADJUST THE

v. DOCKET TO REFLECT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE 41 (a) ARAMARK CAMPUS, LLC, OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL

PROCEDURE

Defendant. (ECF No. 12) 15 On January 13, 2022, a stipulation was filed dismissing this action with prejudice and 17 with each party to bear its own costs and fees. In light of the stipulation of the parties, this action 18 has been terminated, Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)Gi); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 19 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed with prejudice and without an award of costs or attorneys’ fees. Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY ORDERED to CLOSE the file in this 22 case and adjust the docket to reflect voluntary dismissal of this action pursuant to Rule (a).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

FA. |…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.