CDCR

(PC) Glass v. CDCR

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 13, 20221:22-cv-00047California446 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 11 DONALD GLASS, Case No. 1:22-cv-00047-EPG (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE TO THE v. CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 CDCR, et al., 15 Defendants.

17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action. 18 The federal venue statute requires that a civil action, other than one based on diversity 19 jurisdiction, be brought only in: “(1) a judicial district in which any defendant resides, if all 20 defendants are residents of the State in which the district is located; (2) a judicial district in which 21 a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred, or a substantial part 22 of property that is the subject of the action is situated; or (3) if there is no district in which an 23 action may otherwise be brought as provided in this section, any judicial district in which any 24 defendant is subject to the court's personal jurisdiction with respect to such action.” 28 U.S.C. § 25 1391(b). 26 It appears that this case was accidently…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.