Sherman

(PC) Kyle Nargiz v. Sherman

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 14, 20221:19-cv-01173California713 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KYLE NARGIZ, 1:19-cv-01173-AWI-GSA-PC

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ REQUEST

FOR STAY

vs. (ECF No. 30.)

STUART SHERMAN, et al., ORDER STAYING ALL PROCEEDINGS IN

THIS ACTION PENDING CONCLUSION OF

Defendants. MAY 5, 2022 SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE

16 I. BACKGROUND Kyle Nargiz (“Plaintiff”) is a former state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case now proceeds with Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint filed on October 1, 2020 against Defendants Stuart Sherman and Richard Milan (“Defendants”) on Plaintiff’s claim for adverse conditions of confinement under the Eighth Amendment. (ECF No. 13.) On January 11, 2022, the court issued an order scheduling a settlement conference for this case before Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean to be conducted on May 5, 2022, at 1:00pm. (ECF No. 29.) 26 27 1 On April 2, 2021,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.