Munoz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EFRAIN MUNOZ, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, et al., No. 1:08-cv-00759-MMB-BAM 6 Plaintiffs, ORDER RESPECTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION v. IN LIMINE #4 10 PHH MORTGAGE CORPORATION, et al., 13 Defendants. Defendants’ fourth motion in limine (ECF 472) requests an order “to pre- clude any argument, evidence, or testimony regarding a 2009 internal ‘compli- ance audit’ of Atrium Insurance Corporation.” ECF 472, at 1. They argue that evidence about the audit is irrelevant because documents “indicate that the audit did not concern Defendants’ compliance with the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act of 1974—which is the only issue for trial in this case.” Id. (“de- fined term” omitted). Defendants also express concern that documents about the audit use similar terminology to that which the parties will use at trial but that the context for that terminology was…