Munoz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EFRAIN MUNOZ, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, et al., No. 1:08-cv-00759-MMB-BAM 6 Plaintiffs, ORDER RESPECTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION v. IN LIMINE #4 AND DEFENDANTS’ MOTION PHH MORTGAGE CORPORATION, IN LIMINE #2 et al., 13 Defendants. The parties have filed two motions in limine relating to evidence of reg- ulatory oversight and compliance with state insurance regulations that to some degree represent flip sides of the same coin. Plaintiffs’ motion in limine #4 seeks “to exclude Defendants, under Rules 402 and 403, from presenting any argument, evidence, or testimony, including expert testimony, that (i) Atrium was not out of compliance with any state insurance regulations at any time during the Class Period and (ii) no examination or audit of any Defendant by any state insurance regulator or examiner…