Cates

(PC) Sambrano v. Cates

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 14, 20221:21-cv-01456California804 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

OSCAR FERNANDO SAMBRANO, 1:21-cv-01456-GSA-PC

Plaintiff, ORDER FOR CLERK TO RANDOMLY

ASSIGN A UNITED STATES DISTRICT

vs. JUDGE TO THIS CASE

CATES, et al., and

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, Defendants. RECOMMENDING THAT THIS CASE BE DISMISSED FOR PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE

TO COMPLY WITH COURT’S ORDER

(ECF No. 7.)

OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN

DAYS

20 Plaintiff, Oscar Fernando Sambrano, is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On September 29, 2021, Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action. (ECF No. 1.) On November 22, 2021, the court issued an order to show cause requiring Plaintiff to respond within thirty days showing cause why this case should not be dismissed as barred by Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994) and Edwards v. Balisok, 520 U.S. 641…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.