Moseley

(PC) Bradford v. Moseley

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 14, 20222:21-cv-02374California626 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 RAYMOND ALFORD BRADFORD, No. 2:21-cv-02374-WBS-CKD P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS HOWARD E. MOSELEY, et al., Defendants. 14 Plaintiff is a California prisoner proceeding pro se with this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Plaintiff has requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Title 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) reads as follows: In no event shall a prisoner bring a civil action . . . [in forma pauperis] if the prisoner has, on 3 or more prior occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any facility, brought an action or appeal in a court of the United States that was dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, unless the prisoner is under imminent danger of serious physical injury.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.