Munoz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EFRAIN MUNOZ, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, fetal, No. 1:08-cv-00759-MMB-BAM 6 Plaintiffs, ORDER RESPECTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION Vv. IN LIMINE #6 10 |PHH MORTGAGE CORPORATION, |etal., 13 Defendants. Defendants’ sixth motion in limine (ECF 474) seeks to preclude certain expert testimony Plaintiffs intend to offer at trial that Defendants contend ei- ther fails to meet Federal Rule of Evidence 702’s standards for “being grounded |in reliable facts and methods” or that is “prejudicial or otherwise inadmissible under Rule 403.” ECF 474, at 1. Specifically, Defendants seek to preclude the following five categories of □ testimony and other evidence from the expert witnesses identified as to each category: e “Confusing and Prejudicial Accounting Standard Evidence” (Kent …