Oreizi

Oreizi v. County of Fresno

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 17, 20221:18-cv-00662California8,377 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 FARSHAD OREIZI, CASE NO. 1:18-cv-00662-AWI-EPG

Plaintiff,

ORDER ON COUNTY OF FRESNO’S

v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

COUNTY OF FRESNO and DOES (Doc. No. 66) through 20, inclusive, 10 Defendants.

12 This case involves Plaintiff Farshad Oreizi’s allegations of discrimination, retaliation, and unpaid overtime wages against his former employer Defendant County of Fresno. Now before the Court is the County’s motion for summary judgment, which challenges Oreizi’s six remaining causes of action. For the reasons that follow, the Court will grant in part and deny in part the County’s motion. 18 BACKGROUND Oreizi filed his complaint on March 9, 2018. Doc. No. 1 at 6–19 (“Compl.”). He currently proceeds with six causes of action: (1) discrimination under the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (“FEHA”), Cal. Gov’t Code § 12940; (2) retaliation under FEHA, Cal. Gov’t Code § 12940; (3) failure to provide a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.