Munoz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EFRAIN MUNOZ, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, et al., No. 1:08-cv-00759-MMB-BAM 6 Plaintiffs, ORDER RESPECTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION v. IN LIMINE #1 10 PHH MORTGAGE CORPORATION, et al., 13 Defendants. Plaintiffs’ first motion in limine (ECF 466) requests an order under Fed- eral Rules of Evidence 402 and 403 “to exclude from trial any argument, evi- dence, or testimony, including expert or opinion testimony, questioning or con- tradicting findings made by the Court in its summary judgment decision.” ECF 466, at 1. Specifically, Plaintiffs contend that the court has made the following “summary judgment determinations” and seek to preclude Defendants from expressing disagreement with either: (1) the evaluation of whether there was a real transfer of risk un- der the captive reinsurance agreements at issue for purposes of the Real…