Mehner

(PS) Wilcox v. Mehner

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 18, 20222:21-cv-02140California420 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAEL WILCOX, No. 2:21–cv–02140 TLN CKD PS Plaintiff, ORDER v. MAXINE MEHNER, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff has requested a voluntary dismissal of this case without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i). (ECF No. 9.) Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A) provides that “the plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing . . . (i) a notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for summary judgment . . . .” “Under Rule 41(a)(1), a plaintiff has an absolute right voluntarily to dismiss his action prior to service by the defendant of an answer or a motion for summary judgment. Even if the defendant has filed a motion to dismiss, the plaintiff may terminate his action voluntarily by filing a notice of dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1). The dismissal is effective on filing and no court order is required...Unless otherwise stated, the dismissal is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.