(PS)Crane

(PS)Crane v. Juhasz

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 18, 20222:21-cv-00022California2,655 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JODI L. CRANE, No. 2:21-cv-0022-TLN-CKD PS Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS CITY OF DUNSMUIR et al., (ECF No. 27) Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Jodi Crane proceeds pro se in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Defendant’s motion to dismiss the third amended complaint is before the court. (ECF No. 40.) This matter is appropriate for decision without oral argument. See Local Rule 230(g). For the reasons set forth, the undersigned recommends the court grant the motion and dismiss the third amended complaint without further leave to amend. I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Plaintiff originally filed this civil rights action in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. On November 16, 2020, the Northern District screened the complaint and found the complaint did not state a cognizable claim for relief. Plaintiff filed an amended complaint on December 16, 2020. On…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.