Church

(PC) Bradford v. Church

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 18, 20222:21-cv-01412California504 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAYMOND ALFORD BRADFORD, No. 2:21-cv-1412 JAM KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER G. CHURCH, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se. On January 10, 2022, plaintiff filed objections to the December 27, 2021 order. Following review of his objections, and in an abundance of caution, plaintiff is granted thirty days from the date of this order to re-file his original complaint that includes a request for relief and bears his signature. Once plaintiff re-files his original complaint, the court will screen the claims raised therein, as well as address plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis. 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Plaintiff is cautioned that failure to re- file his original complaint will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Plaintiff also requests that the court appoint counsel. District courts lack authority to require counsel to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.