Ento

Ento v. Washington, DC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 18, 20221:21-cv-01537California1,537 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 CHRISTIAN DAVID ENTO, Case No. 1:21-cv-01537-DAD-HBK Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DISMISS CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE1

v.

FOURTEEN-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD

WASHINGTON, DC, et al.,

Defendants. 17 18 This matter comes before the Court upon periodic review. As more fully set forth below, the undersigned recommends this case be dismissed without prejudice due to Plaintiff’s failure to update his address and prosecute this action. FACTS AND BACKGROUND Plaintiff initiated this action by filing a pro se Civil Rights Complaint By a Prisoner form2 om action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on October 18, 2021. (Doc. No. 1). Concurrent with the complaint, Plaintiff filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 26 1 This matter was referred to the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302 (E.D. Ca. 2019). 2 Plaintiff’s complaint was filed using the prison form but the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.