Pam

(PC) Davis v. Pam

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 18, 20222:21-cv-00634California1,829 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DEMETRIUS JEVON DAVIS, No. 2:21-cv-0634 KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER PAM, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, housed in the Sacramento County Jail, proceeding without counsel. Plaintiff seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and is proceeding in forma pauperis. This proceeding was referred to this court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Rule 302. Plaintiff’s second amended complaint is now before the court. As discussed below, plaintiff is granted one final opportunity to file a third amended complaint concerning the alleged delay in receiving medical care. Screening Standards The court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if the prisoner has raised claims that are legally

Plaintiff is an AB…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.