Doe

Doe v. Adams

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 18, 20221:21-cv-01103California352 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JANE DOE, Case No. 1:21-cv-01103-NONE-SAB

Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF THE

COURT TO TERMINATE DEBORAH

v. JOHNSON AND DERRAL ADAMS AS

DEFENDANTS IN THIS ACTION

DERRAL ADAMS, et al., (ECF No. 29) Defendants.

16 On January 14, 2022, the parties filed a stipulated notice of dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a) of Defendants Deborah Johnson and Derral Adams. (ECF No. 29.) The dismissal of these Defendants is without prejudice and with each party to bear their own costs and fees. (Id.) The claims against the other named Defendants are not subject to the stipulation and will remain active. (Id.) Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure allows a party to dismiss some or all of the defendants in an action through a Rule 41(a) notice. Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997); see also Concha v. London, 62 F.3d 1493, 1506 (9th Cir. 1995) (“The plaintiff may dismiss either some or all…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.