Hrones

Hrones v. Rideout Memorial Hospital

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 18, 20222:20-cv-00449California1,247 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Glenda Hrones, No. 2:20-cv-00449-KJM-KJN Plaintiff, ORDER Vv. Rideout Memorial Hospital DBA Adventist Health and Rideout, et al., Defendants. 17 Glenda Hrones alleges she was wrongfully forced to resign from her position as a nurse at Rideout Memorial Hospital in late 2017. She filed this action against the hospital in state court. 20 See generally Compl., Not. Removal Ex. A, ECF No. 1-1. She asserts five claims, all under California law: age discrimination, retaliation, constructive discharge, fraud, and intentional 22 infliction of emotional distress. See generally Second Am. Compl., Not. Removal Ex. A, ECF No. 1-1. After two amendments to her complaint, the hospital removed the case to this court. See 24 generally Not. Removal, ECF No. 1. The hospital now moves for summary judgment. See generally Mot., ECF No. 26; Mem., ECF No. 27. Ms. Hrones opposes the motion, and the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.