Hicks

(PC) Washington v. Hicks

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 19, 20221:19-cv-00156California696 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TRACYE BENARD WASHINGTON, 1:19-cv-00156-NONE-GSA-PC

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT

HICKS’S MOTION TO MODIFY

vs. DISCOVERY AND SCHEDULING ORDER (ECF No. 87.) HICKS, et al.,

ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINES FOR

Defendants. DISCOVERY AND THE FILING OF

DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS FOR ALL

PARTIES

New Discovery Deadline: 03/31/

New Dispositive Motions Deadline: 05/31/

19 20 I. BACKGROUND Tracye Benard Washington (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case now proceeds with Plaintiff’s Complaint filed on February 5, 2019, against defendants Sergeant David Hicks and Correctional Officer Hipolito Rocha (“Defendants”) for use of excessive force in violation of the Eighth Amendment. (ECF No. 1.)1 27 1 On June 22, 2020, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.