(PC) King v. Valley State Prison

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 19, 20221:20-cv-00024California658 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ALTON KING, 1:20-cv-00024-DAD-GSA-PC

Plaintiff, NOTICE AND WARNING OF REQUIREMENTS

FOR OPPOSING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR

vs. SUMMARY JUDGMENT

VALLEY STATE PRISON, et al., (ECF No. 22.)

Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Alton King is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case now proceeds with Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint filed on February 13, 2020, against defendants Warden Raythel Fisher, Jr. and Culinary Staff Member Moosebaur for alleged violations of the RLUIPA, alleged violations of the First Amendment Free Exercise Clause; and against defendant Warden Raythel Fisher, Jr. for alleged adverse conditions of confinement in violation of the Eighth Amendment, and for alleged failure to protect plaintiff in violation of the Eighth Amendment. (ECF No. 6.) On January 14, 2022, Defendants Fisher and Moosebaur filed a motion for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.