(PC)Jordan

(PC)Jordan v. Arcee

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 19, 20221:20-cv-01658California310 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NOLAN JORDAN, ) Case No.: 1:20-cv-01658-DAD-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST v. ) FOR CLARIFICATION REGARDING

EXHAUSTION-MOTION DEADLINE

ARCEE, et al., ) ) (ECF No. 39) Defendants. ) ) ) ) )

Plaintiff Nolan Jordan is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On October 12, 2021, the Court issued the discovery and scheduling order. On January 12, 2022, Defendant filed an exhaustion related motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 38.) On January 14, 2022, Plaintiff filed a request for clarification regarding the exhaustion motion deadline. (ECF No. 39.) Plaintiff submits that he is not sure if he is required to comply with the exhaustion-related deadline or if he is to oppose any action taken by Defendant. Plaintiff is advised the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.