O'Conner

(PC) Leonard v. O'Conner

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 19, 20222:21-cv-01886California775 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FREDERICK EUGENE LEONARD, No. 2:21-cv-1886-EFB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

O’CONNER, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. After a dismissal by the court, plaintiff has filed an amended complaint, which the court must screen. See ECF Nos. 6 & 9. Federal courts must engage in a preliminary screening of cases in which prisoners seek redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The court must identify cognizable claims or dismiss the complaint, or any portion of the complaint, if the complaint “is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted,” or “seeks monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief.” Id. § 1915A(b). The court analyzed plaintiff’s original complaint pursuant to § 1915A as…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.