Jackson v. Fastenal Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 19, 20221:20-cv-00345California555 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MIESHIA MARIE JACKSON, an No. 1:20-cv-00345-JLT-SAB individual, on behalf of herself and others, ORDER FOR ADDITIONAL BRIEFING Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 FASTENAL COMPANY, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 In this proposed class action, Mieshia Marie Jackson alleges that her former employer, Fastenal Company, violated various California labor laws. On October 22, 2021, Plaintiff filed a motion for an order granting preliminary approval of the proposed class-action settlement (Doc. 15) and included a signed copy of the proposed settlement agreement (Doc. 15-3, “Settlement Agreement”). The assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations on December 3, 2021, recommending that the motion be granted. (Doc. 19.) The Court has reviewed the record and now requests supplemental briefing on several issues.1 First, the objection procedure requires class members to file an objection with the court and to send a letter to the administrator and all parties. There are no…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.