Renteria
(PC) Brookins v. Renteria
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BARRY L. BROOKINS, Case No. 1:21-cv-01809-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO
DENY PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE
v. TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) RENTERIA, Correctional Officer,
FOURTEEN-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD
Defendant. (Doc. Nos. 2, 7)
ORDER TO ASSIGN TO DISTRICT JUDGE
17 18 19 Plaintiff Barry L. Brookins, a state prisoner, initiated this action by filing a pro se civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (Doc. No. 1). Plaintiff filed two separate motions seeking leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP motions”). (Doc. Nos. 2, 7). For the reasons discussed below, the undersigned recommends the district court deny Plaintiff’s IFP motions under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) because Plaintiff has had at least three dismissals that constitute strikes and he has not established he meets the imminent danger exception. Plaintiff must pay the full filing fee if he wishes to…