Gilmore

Gilmore v. McMillan-Hendryx

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 20, 20221:20-cv-00483California2,938 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EDMOND TRENT GILMORE AND Case No. 1:20-cv-00483-HBK DANIEL GOWANS, on behalf of themselves, all others similarly situated, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR and the State of California APPROVAL OF PAGA SETTLEMENT1 Plaintiffs, (Doc. No. 20) v. McMILLAN-HENDRYX INCORPORATED, dba AMERICAN

SEALS WEST, INC., GARY HENDRYX,

JUSTIN HENDRYX, DEB C. HALL, Defendants. 20 21 Pending before the Court is the Motion for Approval of PAGA Settlement submitted by Plaintiffs Edmond Trent Gilmore and Daniel Gowans (“Plaintiffs”) on December 22, 2021. (Doc. No. 20, “Motion”). Pursuant to the Court’s Order (Doc. No. 21), Plaintiff filed a supplemental brief and evidence on January 5, 2022 (Doc. No. 22). No opposition was filed. /// ///

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1), the parties consented to magistrate judge jurisdiction. (Doc. No. 16). BACKGROUND A. Summary of the Complaint The initial…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.