Fajardo

Fajardo v. City of Bakersfield

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 20, 20221:16-cv-00699California208 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 GILBERTO FAJARDO, Case No. 1:16-cv-00699-BAK Plaintiff, ORDER ASSIGNING DISTRICT JUDGE

DALE A. DROZD TO CASE FOR LIMITED

v. PURPOSE OF RULING ON MOTION TO

WITHDRAW CONSENT

CITY OF BAKERSFIELD, et al., (ECF No. 66) Defendants. 14 On January 19, 2022, Defendants City of Bakersfield, Lindy DeGeare, and Juan Orozco (“Defendants”) filed a motion seeking to withdraw their consent, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1), to have a United States Magistrate Judge conduct all further proceedings in this case. (ECF No. 66.) Only a district judge may rule on a motion to withdraw consent to magistrate judge 20 jurisdiction. Branch v. Umphenour, 936 F.3d 994, 1003 (9th Cir. 2019). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is respectfully directed 22 to reassign District Judge Dale A. Drozd to this action for the limited purpose of the disposition of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.