Fajardo
Fajardo v. City of Bakersfield
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 GILBERTO FAJARDO, Case No. 1:16-cv-00699-BAK Plaintiff, ORDER ASSIGNING DISTRICT JUDGE
DALE A. DROZD TO CASE FOR LIMITED
v. PURPOSE OF RULING ON MOTION TO
WITHDRAW CONSENT
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD, et al., (ECF No. 66) Defendants. 14 On January 19, 2022, Defendants City of Bakersfield, Lindy DeGeare, and Juan Orozco (“Defendants”) filed a motion seeking to withdraw their consent, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1), to have a United States Magistrate Judge conduct all further proceedings in this case. (ECF No. 66.) Only a district judge may rule on a motion to withdraw consent to magistrate judge 20 jurisdiction. Branch v. Umphenour, 936 F.3d 994, 1003 (9th Cir. 2019). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is respectfully directed 22 to reassign District Judge Dale A. Drozd to this action for the limited purpose of the disposition of…