Williams v. Aetna Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
PRINCE PAUL RAYMOND WILLIAMS, Case No. 1:21-cv-01583-JLT-SAB
Plaintiff, ORDER VACATING FEBRUARY 3, 2022
SCHEDULING CONFERENCE
v. (ECF No. 5) AETNA, INC., Defendants.
15 Plaintiff Prince Paul Raymond Williams, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed a complaint in this action on October 27, 2021. (ECF No. 1.) A scheduling conference is currently set in this matter for February 3, 2022. (ECF No. 5.) The Court shall vacate the scheduling conference as the complaint has not been screened, and defendant has not been served or appeared in this action. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) (“the court shall dismiss a case if at any time if the Court determines that . . . the action . . . (i) is frivolous or malicious; (ii) fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted; or (iii) seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from such relief.”); Cato v. United States, 70 F.3d 1103, 1106 (9th Cir. 1995) (Section 1915 “authorizes a court to review a complaint that has been filed in…