Perez
(PC) Phelps v. Perez
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PAUL PHELPS, Case No. 1:21-cv-01108-JLT-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY
DEFENDANT BETTES SHOULD NOT BE
v. DISMISSED FROM THIS ACTION FOR
FAILURE TO PROVIDE SUFFICIENT
PEREZ, et al., INFORMATION TO EFFECTUATE
SERVICE
Defendants. (ECF No. 18)
THIRTY (30) DAY DEADLINE
17 I. Introduction Plaintiff Paul Phelps (“Plaintiff”) is a pretrial detainee proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s first amended complaint against: (1) Defendants Townsend and Bettes for excessive force in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment; (2) Defendant Perez for supervisor liability in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment; and (3) Defendant County of Madera for Monell liability in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment. II. Service by the United States Marshal On January 6, 2022, the Court issued an order directing…