Perez

(PC) Phelps v. Perez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 21, 20221:21-cv-01108California748 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PAUL PHELPS, Case No. 1:21-cv-01108-JLT-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

DEFENDANT BETTES SHOULD NOT BE

v. DISMISSED FROM THIS ACTION FOR

FAILURE TO PROVIDE SUFFICIENT

PEREZ, et al., INFORMATION TO EFFECTUATE

SERVICE

Defendants. (ECF No. 18)

THIRTY (30) DAY DEADLINE

17 I. Introduction Plaintiff Paul Phelps (“Plaintiff”) is a pretrial detainee proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s first amended complaint against: (1) Defendants Townsend and Bettes for excessive force in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment; (2) Defendant Perez for supervisor liability in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment; and (3) Defendant County of Madera for Monell liability in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment. II. Service by the United States Marshal On January 6, 2022, the Court issued an order directing…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.