Rubio

Rubio v. City of Visalia

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 21, 20221:21-cv-00286California1,911 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RAYMUNDO VICENTE RUBIO, Case No. 1:21-cv-00286-DAD-SAB

Plaintiff, ORDER RE: INFORMAL DISCOVERY

DISPUTE

v. (ECF Nos. 27, 28) CITY OF VISALIA, et al., Defendants. 16 17 18 On January 14, 2022, the parties filed a joint informal discovery dispute letter brief. (ECF No. 28.) The dispute involves the manner in which three of Plaintiff’s witnesses may be deposed. An informal videoconference was held on January 20, 2022 to address the dispute. Counsel Vincent J. DeSimone appeared for Plaintiff and counsel Leonard Charles Herr appeared for Defendants. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Raymundo Vicente Rubio initiated this action on March 1, 2021, asserting multiple federal and state law claims against Defendants City of Visalia, Chief Jason Salazar, and Officers Marisa Burkdoll and William Hansen. (ECF No. 1.) The action arises from an incident on January 22, 2020, when Plaintiff was allegedly targeted by the Officer…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.