Espinosa

(PC) Maraglino v. Espinosa

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 21, 20221:20-cv-00825California886 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DOROTHY GRACE MARIE 1:20-cv-00825-AWI-GSA-PC

MARAGLINO,

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, Plaintiff, RECOMMENDING THAT THIS CASE BE DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, FOR v. FAILURE TO OBEY COURT ORDER (ECF No. 14.)

J. ESPINOSA, et al.,

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE IN FOURTEEN (14) DAYS Defendants.

18 Dorothy Grace Marie Maraglino (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On June 15, 2020, Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action. (ECF No. 1.) On September 13, 2021, the court dismissed the Complaint for failure to state a claim, with leave to file an amended complaint within thirty days. (ECF No. 10.) The thirty-day deadline passed and in that time Plaintiff failed to file an amended complaint or otherwise respond to the court’s order. On November …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.